🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has claimed to have harvested a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Potential Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers said the seeming data breach could aid AI companies looking for material to train their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and record names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, said the breached music would probably be used for training AI models.

“Training on pirated data is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to be used instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a vast online repository of pirated books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own private free equivalent of the service”. He said it could also enable tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between artists, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.